The(G)Forum

Master(G) hat geschrieben:
kei diskussione! nur es bild oder "horray"!

Master(G) hat geschrieben:ah ja, wenn videogames offizell kunscht wäred, de dürft mer z.b. au haggechrüz zeige! wichtig moff! videogames = kunscht!

Uriel hat geschrieben:ffassig vo Kunscht. Du seisch eifach: "Das und das Game halt ich für Kunscht."
Basta.

evo hat geschrieben: du machsch e unfassbar hässige ihdruck. bisch hässig?

Chäller hat geschrieben:[img]braid1.jpg[/img]

Moff hat geschrieben:Gnau drum ischs ja au hirnverbrännt es game als kunscht zgseh bloss will mal grafik speziell isch. Ich bin sicher us dem grund wird au rez meischtens i dem zämehang gnennt, total idiotisch. Das macht das medium doch gar ned us. Und heisst das im umkehrschluss, dass realistischi gemälde oder film kei kunscht si chönd?

Rez doesn't just stack up against a classical work of art; it succeeds above and beyond the classical work. It's just that there's a specific work it matches up with, not just "masterpieces" in general. Rez was inspired by the work of a Russian painter named Wassily Kandinsky. Artists create art for a reason: They have a goal or a message they're trying to convey, even if that message is not immediately apparent to them at the time. Kandinsky happened to know exactly why he created art. He said so on many occasions: He wanted to show how music and color crossed paths in his mind. Many psychologists now believe Kandinsky was probably suffering from a bizarre neurological condition called Synesthesia--he wasn't just talkin' art-queer when he said his paintbox "hissed" at him and cellos were "a deep blue"--his senses were literally crossed so that color had sound and sound had shape. He was often unhappy with his inability to express what was happening in his head. Even in painting, his friends and colleagues said he often seemed frustrated at the failure in communication.

As a game, Rez was not great fun--it was a rail-borne "shooter" where you didn't really "shoot" so much as select vast swathes of targets--but its presentation was brilliant. Rez inextricably tied the player's every action to the beat of the music, which changed and evolved along with your actions and play-style. The visuals, in turn, changed and evolved with the music. All of the senses in Rez crossed with one another, integrated into each other and bled into another in some way, shape or form. If Kandinsky painted to explain his Synesthesia to others, Rez actually let them experience a small portion of it. Rez shares a more complete Synesthetic experience than Kandinsky's paintings simply because of the player's involvement in it. For this one, particular arena, the less interactive medium (painting) is essentially crippled.

http://www.cracked.com/blog/why-ebert-i ... z1Q2fv3iw6

Game für ihn Kunscht isch, und weshalb.

Sylvara hat geschrieben:wieso genau sötte games kei kunst sii? also mal aus reiner neugier.
wills zur 'unterhaltig' da sind? wills mehr als nur eis medium zämeschliesset? wills für 'd'masse' gmacht sind? wills komerziell sind? das gilt alles für viel anderi kunst o... also, nach welem 'snob-kriterium' sinds kei kunst?

ich find das lächerlich. es isch sicher lang nid jedes game kunst, aber a vielne grossartige games sind ganzi teams vo talentierte, inspirierte künstler am werk, grafik designer, composer, autore usw. nid dass die immer zwangsläufig kunst produziere, aber wer schomale emne Uematsu het zueglost oder Samweis concept art het gseh, wird wohl chuum welle bhaupte das sig kei kunst.
tumms, elitärs gschnorr.